02:41
Unknown
| Would you trust these men? |
involved in an expenses scandal a little while ago? Their response
was "It's not against the rules!" as if that were some kind of justifi-
cation for their shameful greed and unethical behaviour. Any sensible
person's attitude would be to say "Well, it bloody well should be!"
Well, it's happened again, as demonstrated by the findings over
the 'cash for access' scandal involving two former foreign sec-
retaries MALCOM RIFKIND and JACK STRAW.
Apart from "a minor misuse of parliamentary resources"
on Jack Straw's part, both politicians have been cleared of
any wrongdoing, despite Malcom Rifkind boasting to undercover
reporters posing as employees of a non-existent communications
agency that he was able to arrange "useful access" to every British
ambassador in the world.due to his status, and that he was self-
employed and had loads of "free time" on his hands.
The decision is no surprise of course, when politicians
are both judge and jury in the matter of their own conduct.
They're the biggest 'benefit scroungers' in Britain and are
only out for themselves. Shame on them!
the 'cash for access' scandal involving two former foreign sec-
retaries MALCOM RIFKIND and JACK STRAW.
Apart from "a minor misuse of parliamentary resources"
on Jack Straw's part, both politicians have been cleared of
any wrongdoing, despite Malcom Rifkind boasting to undercover
reporters posing as employees of a non-existent communications
agency that he was able to arrange "useful access" to every British
ambassador in the world.due to his status, and that he was self-
employed and had loads of "free time" on his hands.
The decision is no surprise of course, when politicians
are both judge and jury in the matter of their own conduct.
They're the biggest 'benefit scroungers' in Britain and are
only out for themselves. Shame on them!
Posted in: Cartoons
0 comments:
Post a Comment