was going into production, ADAM WEST was trying
to drum up support for him getting the opportunity of re-
prising his role as the Caped Crusader. Interviewed on
TVAM, he said he'd only be interested in doing it if it was
a film noir, gothic, serious type of movie, but was cer-
tainly up for playing Batman on the big screen.
TIM BURTON wasn't interested in availing himself
of West's services, beyond a cameo role as Dr. THOMAS
WAYNE, young BRUCE W's father. Perhaps because he
felt that Wayne Sr. being killed at the beginning of the movie
was somehow meant to symbolise the demise of his owner-
ship of the role, West declined the cameo. If he didn't
get to play Batman, he didn't want to play at all.
At the time of the movie being made, West was
only around 54/55, so it wasn't altogether impossible
for him to have carried it off, especially if the producers
had followed FRANK MILLER's concept of an older, re-
tired Batman returning to the fray. As Batman in action
was mainly a stuntman in the suit, I feel there was no
real impediment to West's participation.
Except one perhaps. That being, with West's in-
volvement, audiences would've anticipated the movie
being like the '60s TV show. In the end, it didn't matter,
because that's exactly what they expected anyway. On my
first visit to see the movie, I overheard departing viewers
at the film's finish saying "I thought it was going to be
just like the TV show!" They sounded disappointed
that it wasn't, much to my surprise.
Perhaps I shouldn't have been. Because of a
strike on British TV at the time, the '60s Batman TV
show had been drafted in to fill airtime and, surprisingly,
become quite a hit with early morning viewers, sparking
a minor resurgence in Batmania that almost rivalled its
'60s heyday. It was relatively short-lived, but the camp
version of Batman was freshly established in the
minds of British viewers at least.
It would've been interesting to see West getting a
crack at playing the DARK KNIGHT persona of Bat-
man. I think he could've pulled it off, but alas it was not
to be. Perhaps, on reflection, it was for the best. Maybe
Adam West's Batman belongs in the '60s, as much as
The BEATLES and SEAN CONNERY's version
of BOND - at least to people around my age.
And yet... I still think it could've worked, and it
would've been great to see West finally getting what
he so richly deserved - a mayor, motion picture block-
buster movie, reprising the role with which he'd been so
long associated, but playing it straight and without the
laughs. C'mon, admit it - you'd have loved to see
that movie too. Wouldn't you? Do tell.
0 comments:
Post a Comment