STOP!!! Don't go just yet. I know I've shown you this Batman figure (by Marx) before, but this time, something's different. Before I get to that, just a quick recap. When I first bought this (replacement) figure more than a quarter of a century ago, the cape was frayed, and the Bat-a-rang and utility belt were missing (along with the Bat emblem). I used the original cape as a template to make a new one out of non-fraying felt, created a Bat-a-rang from Perspex, and crafted a utility belt, again using felt. I printed the symbol from a picture of the one used on Adam West's costume and as you can see below, the result was pretty good. Obviously I'd have preferred all the original components, but believe me, unless it's unopened and unplayed with, you'd be pretty hard-pressed to find this classic toy in any condition, never mind a complete version. (And it'd cost you a small fortune if you did.)
Bats looks a little brighter here as photo was taken in daylight |
So help me out guys. Look at the photos and tell me which of the two belts looks more at home on Batman (who looks for all the world like a Gerry Anderson puppet) - the handmade felt belt or the other 'real' one. Your opinions will be carefully considered and help me come to a final decision as to which belt Bats gets to wear full-time. Kindly register your vote now if you'd all be so good. (No prizes unfortunately, just the joy of taking part.)
I think there's a layer of dust on Bats in the first pic, hence the grey looking grubbier |
0 comments:
Post a Comment