| BATMAN copyright DC COMICS |
Yes, yes, I know... I've show this MARX TOYS Twistable BATMAN at least a couple of times before on the blog, but trust me - there's a reason for his 'return performance'. First, let me tell you about ol' Bats here. When I got him around 25 years ago (to replace the ones I'd had as a kid), he didn't have his Bat-emblem, utility belt or Bat-a-rang - so I made them. I also used his original, very worn cape as a template to make a new one, and that's all my handiwork in the above photo. Bats cost me either £30 or £35 at the time, and I considered it a good buy. (As opposed to a 'goodbye' - to my dosh.)
Around a fortnight or so ago, I saw another of the same Bats figure on ebay with a starting price of £10.50, and with only one bidder. It was in a similar condition to my own toy when I'd first bought it, though perhaps the cape was just a little more shabby. "I'll keep my eye on him," I thought, "and see if I can get me another figure to restore." It stayed at that price until a day or two before the auction ended, when it suddenly went up to £26 or £28 because of others bidding on it. Not long before the auction ended (an hour or so, can't quite remember) the price was suddenly £211, with the figure finally going for £260-odd. I never did bid on the figure because, at that price, I'd be wanting a pristine condition one complete with his accessories, not one that required work. But hey, £260 - that's some serious moolah!
If there's anyone out there who has a spare utility belt and Bat-a-rang for this figure, get in touch through the comments section and I'll make you an offer. Although I think I did a good job restoring Bats, I'd like to nudge him a little closer to his original condition as far as his appearance goes. Also, give me a shout if you've got the original header-card (or a copy) for the poly-bag in which he was sold back in the '60s.


17:09
Unknown
Posted in:
0 comments:
Post a Comment